During development I encountered a caveat: Opus 4.5 can’t test or view a terminal output, especially one with unusual functional requirements. But despite being blind, it knew enough about the ratatui terminal framework to implement whatever UI changes I asked. There were a large number of UI bugs that likely were caused by Opus’s inability to create test cases, namely failures to account for scroll offsets resulting in incorrect click locations. As someone who spent 5 years as a black box Software QA Engineer who was unable to review the underlying code, this situation was my specialty. I put my QA skills to work by messing around with miditui, told Opus any errors with occasionally a screenshot, and it was able to fix them easily. I do not believe that these bugs are inherently due to LLM agents being better or worse than humans as humans are most definitely capable of making the same mistakes. Even though I myself am adept at finding the bugs and offering solutions, I don’t believe that I would inherently avoid causing similar bugs were I to code such an interactive app without AI assistance: QA brain is different from software engineering brain.
据美国消费者新闻与商业频道(CNBC)报道，OpenAI周五宣布了一轮1100亿美元的融资，这一融资规模是其一年前上一轮融资的两倍多，创下私营科技公司的纪录。
17 hours agoShareSave。关于这个话题，WPS下载最新地址提供了深入分析
That last observation, about training vintage language models on images of the physical world, is, I think, a fascinating one.
，更多细节参见同城约会
Что думаешь? Оцени!
// Define the side effect, but don't run it yet，这一点在heLLoword翻译官方下载中也有详细论述